home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Subject: Re: Proposal
- Date: Wed, 1 Jun 1994 13:45:05 +0200 (MDT)
- In-Reply-To: <199406010806.KAA19392@blade.stack.urc.tue.nl> from "Erlend Nagel" at Jun 1, 94 10:06:15 am
- From: Annius.Groenink@cwi.nl (Annius Groenink)
- X-Face: "E3Hm]k]&:,OEP<{D2ixJf>-9[qOGLebNa0&cQyFL-a~)kTM3&&I"gFw=fJ]K%1IduGjOE`
- ZGu]&~G]QNGa7i/L!+#Xng<|+}HKYHj~5?fTInUEUh0$I1gBI7jrA!&_|e/pR1[cX:^xgJTPsrjA_9
- m8Zli[|.-u{]+c1(6C7mL*m`/_J\>.{4!:g
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Precedence: bulk
-
-
- > Agreed, I think we do need some standard here too. Maybe we should
- > suggest that the minimizer is only for non-modal dialogs, and that
- > dialogs never have the fuller and scroll-bar. I really dislike some
- > programs that were written with 640*480 in mind, that give me scrollbars
- > to move through the dialog on my 640*400 screen. Maybe it would be a
- > good recommendation to limit dialogs to 320 pixels in the vertical
- > direction.
-
- 38 columns times 22 rows should generally be kept as a maximum. Otherwise,
- split the dialog into smaller ones.
-
-